Disperse This
"RDD" is short in the nuclear emergency business (no, business is most definitely NOT booming) for Radiological Dispersal Device. The conventional wisdom among pundits used to be, "Whoa - not much distinction in the public's mind between an RDD and an actual nuclear explosion. We know better, but let's scare the bejeezus out of everyone; makes for good copy."
Now that an actual, semi-credible RDD threat has been uncovered with the arrest of pathetic loser Jose Padilla, the Powers that Attempt to Control our Every Thought (a/k/a New York Times) are now soft-pedaling the reality of a RDD.
The Times may be a-changin', for it has a balanced, accurate, only slightly misleading analysis article in today's front section. The misleading part is the statement, about one particular type of radiation source, that it"...would emit enough radiation to kill a terrorist before he could attach it to conventional explosives." This is first of all a bit of an overstatement, since an average-sized person would, indeed, get a guaranteed lethal dose if he (or she) was in contact with such a source -- but it would not be an instant death; it would likely take a few minutes (to hours if the terrorist wore some protective lead aprons). Certainly enough time, if the person knew what they were doing, to package the RDD for his/her colleagues to deliver.
Remember, these people have shown us time and again that they do not especially value the lives of their foot soldiers.
"RDD" is short in the nuclear emergency business (no, business is most definitely NOT booming) for Radiological Dispersal Device. The conventional wisdom among pundits used to be, "Whoa - not much distinction in the public's mind between an RDD and an actual nuclear explosion. We know better, but let's scare the bejeezus out of everyone; makes for good copy."
Now that an actual, semi-credible RDD threat has been uncovered with the arrest of pathetic loser Jose Padilla, the Powers that Attempt to Control our Every Thought (a/k/a New York Times) are now soft-pedaling the reality of a RDD.
The Times may be a-changin', for it has a balanced, accurate, only slightly misleading analysis article in today's front section. The misleading part is the statement, about one particular type of radiation source, that it"...would emit enough radiation to kill a terrorist before he could attach it to conventional explosives." This is first of all a bit of an overstatement, since an average-sized person would, indeed, get a guaranteed lethal dose if he (or she) was in contact with such a source -- but it would not be an instant death; it would likely take a few minutes (to hours if the terrorist wore some protective lead aprons). Certainly enough time, if the person knew what they were doing, to package the RDD for his/her colleagues to deliver.
Remember, these people have shown us time and again that they do not especially value the lives of their foot soldiers.


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home